Collegium Ramazzini Statement on Russia's war on Ukraine

https://collegiumramazzini.org/news

The Collegium Ramazzini is an international scientific society that examines critical issues in
occupational and environmental medicine with a view towards action to prevent disease and
promote health. The Collegium derives its name from Bernardino Ramazzini, the father of
occupational medicine, a professor of medicine of the Universities of Modena and Padua in the
late 1600s and the early 1700s. The Collegium is comprised of 180 physicians and scientists
from 35 countries, each of whom is elected to membership. The Collegium is independent of
commercial interests.
The Collegium Ramazzini joins its scientific colleagues around the world in condemning
Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The Russian invasion is a violation of Article 2 of
the UN Charter, which states that “all States have the obligation to refrain in their international
relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence
of any State.” Russia’s invasion has resulted in more than 100,000 military and an untold number
of civilian deaths and injuries, and displaced over 12 million people. Attacks on civilian
populations have destroyed more than 100,000 private homes, 15,000 apartment buildings, 1,118
schools, and 978 medical facilities. In addition, 27% of Ukraine is contaminated with landmines
and unexploded ordnance, which will continue to pose hazards for decades.
As public health humanitarians, we condemn Russia’s acts of terror against civilians. In
addition to Russia’s killing and injuring civilians with indiscriminate weapons and targeted
attacks, we condemn the deliberate targeting of civilian energy and water infrastructure,
destruction of schools and health-care facilities, use of sexual violence as a weapon, deportation
of children, and atrocities committed against civilians in Bucha, Izium and elsewhere. We
condemn the attempts to destroy Ukraine’s cultural heritage by destroying churches and
museums and looting Ukrainian art and cultural artifacts.
As scientists investigating the interface of environmental pollution and human health, we
condemn Russia for its devastating damage to Ukraine’s environment, including air, water, and
soil pollution; conflict-related fires; toxic releases and spills; flooding of mines; and habitat and
ecosystem destruction. The 1998 Statute of the International Criminal Court treats armed attacks
that cause widespread, long-term and severe damage to the environment as war crimes. We
condemn Russia’s military seizure of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), the first-
ever takeover of a nuclear power plant, which is prohibited by the Protocol 1 Amendment to the
Geneva Conventions. The military takeover increases the risks radiation exposure to nuclear
plant workers and the general population. A radiation release from the ZNPP as a result of
military activities could spread over two million square kilometers and expose one million
people to radiation.
As an academy of experts that promotes the fundamental right to a safe and healthful
work environment, we condemn Russia for worsening economic instability in Ukraine. Nearly
five million jobs have been lost since the war began and real wages have dropped by over 11%.
Sixty percent of those who fled to other regions of Ukraine are still out of work. The war
threatens to lower labor standards and has weakened enforcement of occupational regulations,
creating unsafe working conditions that further jeopardize the security and safety of civilians at
work.

 As advocates for global health, we condemn Russia’s use of energy and food as weapons.

Russia’s cutoff of oil and gas to Europe has resulted in an energy crisis and surge in fuel costs
globally. Russia’s military takeover of Ukraine’s agricultural land, destruction of grain storage
facilities, and impairment of shipments from Ukrainian seaports threatens the food security of
400 million people, especially in Africa and Asia. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has resulted in an
estimated $2.8 trillion in lost global output by the end of 2022. These are funds that could have
been used for health care, food security, and the climate crisis.
We insist that Russia immediately withdraw from Ukraine’s occupied territories and halt
its aggression.
We urge the global community to support Ukraine in its post-war recovery and
reconstruction.
The Collegium is committed to assist Ukraine in efforts to achieve lasting peace, health,
and sustainable development.

 

Ethik

Publications by Prof. Dr. Xaver Baur:

Baur X, Budnik LT, Ruff K et al. Ethics, morality, and conflicting interests: how questionable professional integrity in some scientists supports global corporate influence in public health. Int J Occup Environ Health 2015; 21: 172-175  Abstract

Baur X. Ethik in der Arbeitsmedizin - Orientierungshilfe in ethischen Spannungsfeldern. Landsberg: ecomed Medizin; 2009

Das deutschsprachige Referenzwerk für ethische Fragen in der Arbeitsmedizin Das Buch macht die Spannungslinien deutlich, denen arbeitsmedizinisch Tätige ausgesetzt sind. Die authentischen Beiträge aus den unterschiedlichen Perspektiven bringen die Interessenverflechtungen und -gegensätze auf den Punkt, die es für Arbeitsmediziner in ihrer "Sandwich"-Position zwischen Arbeitgebern und Arbeitnehmern, Sozialbehörden und Betroffenen, Interessengruppen, in den verschiedenen Gremien und auch in der Forschungsförderung (Drittmittelvergabe) immer wieder gibt. Damit stößt es eine breite Diskussion über die Maßstäbe des rechten Handelns in der Arbeitsmedizin an. Ziel ist es, die Rolle der Arbeits- und Betriebsmedizin immer wieder kritisch zu reflektieren und einen eigenen Standpunkt sowie adäquate Strategien zur Wahrung der Unabhängigkeit in diffizilen Konstellationen zu entwickeln.

 

See also:

Corporate Influence threatens the Public health

Vested interests, whose primary goal is to protect markets for products which frequently have hazardous potentials, are increasingly combined with distortion of science applied in legislation, policy-making, standard-setting and legal proceedings. The Collegium Ramazzini held a panel entitled “Corporate Influence Threatens the Public’s Health” on November 1, 2018, which drew attention to these hazardous malfeasances. Strategies to meet the related ongoing challenges by promoting and protecting the integrity of research, the welfare of patients and society, and the quality of medical/health education, were debated.

industry influence

Egilman D, Wallace W, Hom C. Corporate corruption of medical literature: asbestos studies concealed by W.R. Grace & Co. Account Res 1998; 6: 127-147

Lemen RA. Role of government in occupational and environmental health. Int J Occup Environ Health 1999; 5: 283-286

Axelson O, Balbus JM, Cohen G et al. Re: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. Int J Occup Environ Health 2003; 9: 386-389; author reply 389-390

Bailar JC, 3rd, Ballal SG, Boback M et al. FIOH-sponsored newsletter misrepresents asbestos hazards in Zimbabwe. Int J Occup Environ Health 2006; 12: 254-258

Egilman D, Howe S. Against anti-health epidemiology: corporate obstruction of public health via manipulation of epidemiology. Int J Occup Environ Health 2007; 13: 118-124

Baur X, Soskolne CL, Lemen RA et al. How conflicted authors undermine the World Health Organization (WHO) campaign to stop all use of asbestos: spotlight on studies showing that chrysotile is carcinogenic and facilitates other non-cancer asbestos-related diseases. Int J Occup Environ Health 2015; 21: 176-179

Welch LS. Asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma, but not this asbestos exposure: an amicus brief to the Michigan Supreme Court. Int J Occup Environ Health 2007; 13: 318-327

Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloombury Press, 2011

Michaels D. Doubt Is Their Product How Industrys Assault On Science Threatens Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016

Transport, Produktion, Begasungsmittel, Container, Chemicalien, Glyphosate

Ausgewählte Publikationen von Prof. Dr. med. Xaver Baur zu Transport und Produktion, Begasungsmittel, Container, Chemikalien, Glyphosat:

view publications...

Weiter Informationen unter:

http://www.eomsociety.org/news/news-from-eom.html

und

http://elte.prompt.hu/sites/default/files/tananyagok/AtmosphericChemistry/ch02s03.html#d0e1556

  The Monsanto Papers Analyzing, 141 recently de-classified documents, made public during the course of pending toxic tort litigation, In Re Roundup Products Liability Litigation, McHenry has reveal “Monsanto-sponsored ghostwriting of articles published in toxicology journals and the lay media, interference in the peer review process, behind-the-scenes influence on retraction and the creation of a so-called academic website as a front for the defense of Monsanto products”. by LB McHenry in Int J Risk Saf Med. 2018;29(3-4):193-205. The Monsanto Papers

Agricultural Health Study  Glyphosate Use and Cancer Incidence in the Agricultural Health Study. Andreotti et al.,

The Agricultural Health Study (AHS) is a ongoing  prospective cohort of licensed pesticide applicators enrolled in Iowa or North Carolina, Note that the authors do not provide data on expose (no human biomonitoring no ambient monitoring data is collected within the study). The pesticide use data is based on a follow-up questionnaire that was administered five years after enrollment and completed by 63% of the participants. In the recent data update the authors could not observe a  associations between glyphosate use and overall cancer risk or  total lymphohematopoietic cancers, including NHL and multiple myeloma. However, there was evidence of an increased risk of AML (acute myeloid leukemia) for applicators, particularly in the highest category of glyphosate exposure compared with never users of glyphosate. The authors  truncated cancer incidence follow-up in 2005 to be concurrent with the last exposure information. Based on 26 exposed cases,there was an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) compared with never users (RR = 2.44, 95% CI = 0.94 to 6.32, Ptrend = .11), though this association was not statistically significant. Expeditious efforts to replicate these findings are warranted.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Glyphosat: Kann ein Behörden-Bewertungsbericht Plagiate enthalten? Am Beispiel Monsanto & Glyphosat-Wiederzulassung in der EU.

Plagiat-Gutachten zum Glyphosat-Report von Dr. Stefan Weber

https://www.global2000.at/sites/global/files/Gutachten%20Plagiate%20Glyphosat%20Report%20final(1).pdf

Zitat aus der Zusammenfassung: „In Summe ist den Verfassern des Reports der Vorwurf des erheblichen wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens und des alle definitorischen Kriterien erfüllenden Textplagiats im Sinne einer bewussten Täuschung über die wahre Autorschaft zu machen.“

EU parlament Glyphosate Workshop 2017

Lobbyism